The report was introduced by
the Cabinet member for Environmental Services and Waste for Vale of
White Horse District Council, Councillor Mark Coleman. Councillor
Sam James Lawrie, Cabinet member for Environment for South
Oxfordshire District Council was unable to attend. Officers
supporting were Environmental Services Technical Team Leader, Head
of Housing and Environment, Waste Projects Officer and
Environmental Services Technical Team Leader.
Members asked questions on the
performance report:
- Fly tipping: why was
there an increase? It was responded that some people drive through
the area to fly tip. It was hard to understand unless we get to
prosecute / have evidence. An officer confirmed that the cost was
part of the contract but passed back to us. Sometimes it was people
fly tipping black sacks near to public bins, not just large bulky
items, which is the usual impression of fly tipping.
- A member highlighted
an issue raised by a resident of electricals being thrown into the
main compartment of the waste vehicle. It was an issue of a hired
vehicle having no separate cage. Biffa representative confirmed
that they will investigate these occurrences if given the detail of
the incidents.
- Officer confirmed
that more detailed questions were being asked when members of the
public raised street cleansing as an issue, to make sure we get
better detail of what the real issues were. The ownership of
certain street cleaning assets were more complex and the public
would not necessarily know if it was a council responsibility or
not.
- Recycling plastic
film – currently only in supermarkets. The Cabinet member responded to this. It could be
part of household recycling in the future depending on government
decision, but currently residents need to take soft plastics to
supermarkets. They currently count as contamination in council
recycling and it would cost money to start taking those. Head of
Environment added that the timings and planning required would take
longer – communications to residents, checking if Edmonton
sorting facility can handle the film, and the expense.
- Call centre wait
times – a member queried the lower rating. Biffa
representative answered that the situation was better now, with
added members of staff in the call centre.
- A member would like
to see the background of the survey respondents, to see who was
replying. For example, a parish council single response versus a
single resident. An officer responded that it goes to single
residents, not to councils. GDPR issues means that they could only
get data for the first part of a post code.
- Paragraph four
– agreed review framework. As a scrutiny committee, how do we
review the framework? Can we review this? Was the same format
suitable for different contracts? Head of Service did explain that
the current contract extension was measured in a different way, but
the member questioning the framework questioned whether a
one-size-fits-all framework was used, as there would be different
needs. This could be a future item for Scrutiny.
- Paragraph 69 –
KPIs including climate objectives. A member questioned the impact
of changes in climate targets on Biffa KPI’s. Cabinet member
responded that this would be a question for Climate committees, as
this report was to assess the 2023 performance of Biffa and its
current KPIs.
- It was confirmed that
surveys were open to all residents, and the communication push from
the officer team was discussed.
- Table one page 16 on
recycling rate. Do we remove more garden waste than other councils,
and should we measure against others. Cabinet member explained that
authorities can choose what they offer at present. He discussed the
need to see waste levels reduce, and discussed high recycling
rates, and how lower recycling could indicate reusing and less
waste generation, which was the ideal.
- Discussed packaging
(card) and click and collect services to reduce waste.
- Emptying public
litter bins was included in the survey, for the bins the council
collected. The results of the survey (includes street cleansing)
would be reviewed with Biffa to see where to monitor.
- A member questioned
the council satisfaction being fair. Was this being improved? It
was responded by Head of Service that this was for 2023. Now in
2024 we had a contract extension, and closer working to monitor
that. It was confirmed that closer working between the council and
Biffa meant improvements in the working relationship.
Members voted in favour to
accept the officer’s recommendation on Biffa contract
performance for 2023.
RECOMMENDATION
Joint Scrutiny committee
considered Biffa Municipal Ltd (Biffa) performance in delivering
the household waste collection, street cleansing and ancillary
services contract for the period 1 January 2023 to 31 December 2023
(2023 calendar year) and made comments before a final assessment on
performance is agreed.