Erection of 16 dwellings with associated garages, new access road, associated works and public open space.
Minutes:
The officer presented the report on a full application for residential development of 16 new homes, with vehicular access off Packhorse Lane, Marcham, and a footway. Consultations, representations, policy and guidance and this site’s planning history were detailed in the officer’s report which formed part of the agenda pack for this meeting.
Updates from the report:
· The drainage engineer had withdrawn his objection;
· The applicant had agreed the financial contributions set out in the report.
David Walton, from Marcham Parish Council, spoke objecting to the application; his concerns included:
· The development would adversely affect the character of the area;
· It would damage the southern aspect of the village;
· The access from the site was on to a dangerous bend;
· The proposed flood area and play areas needed to be separated;
· The pavement to Abingdon should be at least 1.5 metres wide;
· The foul drainage system needed upgrading as part of this application.
Robert Froud-Williams, the applicant’s agent, spoke in favour of the application:
· The proposed development was a second phase in a larger housing development;
· It would cause no harm to the setting of the nearby listed building nor the character of the village;
· The drainage strategy had been revised and now there was no objection from the drainage engineer;
· There were no highways objections;
· One third of the homes would be affordable;
· The developer would pay towards the village hall facilities.
Councillor Catherine Webber, the local ward councillor:
· Believed that there was a drainage problem at the site and more homes brought greater risk;
· The access was in a dangerous location;
· There should be one access for the three adjacent housing developments, not three.
The committee considered this application, with advice from officers where appropriate; the discussion covered the following points:
· The number of homes on this site had been reduced;
· The development was in keeping with the village;
· There were three drainage conditions to overcome concerns;
· Despite the access being onto the bend on Packhorse Lane, there were no highway objections;
· The developers had worked together to propose one access to the three development sites.
RESOLVED (for 6; against 3; abstentions 4)
To grant planning permission, subject to:
A section 106 agreement to secure the following:
· on-site affordable housing provision
· on site open space provision
· contributions towards off-site facilities and services
The following conditions:
1 : 12 Month time limit
2 : Approved plans
3 : MC2 - Materials (Samples)
4 : Details of access onto Packhorse Lane
5 : HY6 - Access, parking & turning in accordance with plan
6 : HY12 - New estate roads
7 : LS1 - Landscaping scheme
8 : Open space management plan
9 : LS4 - Tree protection
10 : Drainage details (surface and foul)
11 : Sustainable drainage scheme
12 : Drainage strategy in accordance with the flood risk assessment
13 : RE7[I] – Boundary details in accordance with plan
14 : RE5 - Restriction on fences / walls
15 : RE11 - Garage accommodation
16 : Contaminated land investigation
17 : CN11 - Scheme of archaeological investigation
Supporting documents: