Venue: Abbey House, Abingdon
Contact: Steve Culliford, tel. 01235 540307; e-mail: steve.culliford@southandvale.gov.uk
No. | Item | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notification of substitutes and apologies for absence To record apologies for absence and the attendance of substitute councillors. Minutes: Maria Grindley from the Audit Commission had sent her apologies for absence. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Declarations of interest To receive any declarations of personal or personal and prejudicial interests in respect of items on the agenda for this meeting. Minutes: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Urgent business and chairman's announcements To receive notification of any matters, which the chairman determines should be considered as urgent business and the special circumstances that have made the matters urgent, and to receive any announcements from the chairman. Minutes: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statements, petitions and questions from the public relating to matters affecting the Audit and Governance Committee To receive any statements, petitions and questions from the public under standing order 32. Minutes: None |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health and safety annual report PDF 89 KB To consider the report of the head of corporate strategy. Reporting officer: Sally Truman
Purpose: To scrutinise the councils' progress against our statutory health and safety responsibilities.
Recommendation: To note the annual Health and Safety report and endorse the health and safety action plan for 2012/13 Additional documents: Minutes: The committee considered the annual health and safety report from the head of corporate strategy. This scrutinised performance against the 2011/12 health and safety action plan and proposed an action plan for 2012/13. The committee noted that there had been no significant health and safety incidents during the year and no incidents requiring the Health and Safety Executive’s involvement.
In answer to a question regarding the lone worker policy, the officer reported that the council had decided not to request reports from the council’s lone worker system as this brought additional cost without benefit. The committee requested that this was explained in future reports.
The committee noted that the fire policy had been published for all council property run by the council for its operational purposes but a fire policy needed to be published for other property, such as investment property. This would be added to the action plan for 2012/13.
The committee asked whether Cabinet retained an overall responsibility for health and safety. In the past, health and safety responsibilities had fallen on the chief executive and the leader of the council. In previous years, all members of the then Executive were given health and safety training. The committee noted that the leader of the council, the chief executive and strategic directors were all members of the Health and Safety Review Board, which monitored health and safety performance and impending legislation or guidance. The officers agreed to check whether other Cabinet members had health and safety responsibilities also. The committee noted that all councillors would be offered a health and safety briefing shortly.
RESOLVED: To
(a) note the health and safety report 2011/12 and endorse the action plan for 2012/13;
(b) add to the action plan for 2012/13 that the fire policy needs to be published for council properties not used by the council to provide services; and
(c) check whether the Cabinet members have health and safety responsibilities, and if so, receive health and safety training. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District and parish council elections - May 2011 PDF 101 KB To consider the report of the chief executive and returning officer. Reporting officer: David Buckle
Purpose: To provide information to the committee on the cost of and accounting arrangements for the district and parish council elections in May 2011. Recommendation: To note the information provided in the report on the costs of and accounting arrangements for the May 2011 elections. Minutes: The committee considered the chief executive and returning officer’s report on the costs and accounting arrangements of the district and parish council elections held in May 2011. This was the first report of its kind, reporting on the accounting for the local elections.
The committee noted that the cost of running the 2011 local elections had been significantly lower than predicted at budget setting time. This was for a variety of reasons, including:
The committee questioned whether professional project planners should have been used to assist officers. In response, the officers reported that the reasons for the budget variance were difficult to predict but accepted that project planning advice could be sought to assist with financial planning for future local elections.
Councillors asked how much discount the council had received from the elections printer. The returning officer reported that this was confidential information he could not disclose. Instead, the committee asked to see the estimated cost of the 2011 local elections, had the printer fulfilled its contract and had the government not held a referendum. The committee wished to compare the original budget with the expected outcome, had these variables not occurred. This would help the council learn for the next local elections.
RESOLVED To:
(a) note the information provided in the report on the costs of and accounting arrangements for the May 2011 district and parish council elections; and
(b) request the returning officer to provide the committee with an analysis of the estimated cost of the 2011 local elections, had the elections printer fulfilled its contract and had the government not held a referendum. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Complaints procedure PDF 89 KB To consider strategic management team’s report. Reporting officer: David Buckle
Purpose: To seek agreement to proposed changes to the corporate complaints system.
Recommendations: To 1. approve the revised corporate complaints procedure attached as appendix one to this report; and 2. carry out a short review of the complaints procedure every twelve months and a thorough evaluation every three years. Additional documents: Minutes: The committee considered the chief executive’s report that recommended the adoption of a revised complaints procedure. The officers had identified several improvements that could be made to the procedure, including:
The committee had a contrary view, believing that councillors’ input at a third stage was important. The officers were asked to reconsider the revised complaints procedure to include this and consult the committee’s chairman, Councillor Mike Murray, and Councillor Judy Roberts before bringing an amended proposal back to the next committee meeting for consideration.
Councillors suggested that the complaints form (appendix 1 to the report) should include a space for the complainant to sign and date the complaint, and that the complaints procedure and form should be easily accessible on the council’s website.
RESOLVED: To request the officers to reconsider the revised complaints procedure to include councillors’ input in the third stage, and consult Councillors Mike Murray and Judy Roberts on the revised proposal before submitting it to the next committee meeting for consideration. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Code of conduct complaints procedure PDF 98 KB To consider the report of the head of legal and democratic services. Reporting officer: Margaret Reed
Purpose: To adopt procedures for dealing with code of conduct complaints and to note the frequently asked questions that we will publish on the council’s website to help people understand the process for dealing with code of conduct complaints.
Recommendations: To 1. adopt the procedures for dealing with code of conduct complaints set out in appendix 1 to this report with effect from 12 July 2012 and in place of the council’s existing arrangements for dealing with code of conduct complaints; 2. authorise the monitoring officer to make minor amendments to the procedures including minor or consequential amendments required for clarification, consistency and compliance with the council’s style guide; 3. note the document entitled Code of conduct complaints: frequently asked questions that will provide information for members of the public when making code of conduct complaints. Additional documents:
Minutes: The committee considered the monitoring officer’s report that recommended procedures for dealing with code of conduct complaints.
The Localism Act 2011 had abolished arrangements introduced by the Local Government Act 2000 to promote high standards of conduct amongst councillors. The 2000 Act required councils to adopt a code of conduct, and appoint a standards committee to monitor councillors’ conduct. The Localism Act introduced a new code of conduct, which Council adopted on 16 May 2012, and removed the need for a standards committee. Council also appointed the monitoring officer as the proper officer to consider and determine code of conduct complaints about councillors, and appointed the Audit and Governance Committee as the committee responsible for dealing with allegations about potential breaches of the code of conduct that the monitoring officer considered inappropriate for officers to determine. The committee was asked to adopt new procedures to deal with code of conduct complaints to comply with the new legislation, and to appoint panels to consider complaints referred by the monitoring officer.
The committee suggested that paragraph 24 of the procedure could be improved by explaining what would happen after the monitoring officer had applied tests to the complaint. Councillors suggested the officers considered producing a flow chart to show the various stages in the procedure and publish this on the council’s website. The monitoring officer agreed to discuss this with her fellow monitoring officers across Oxfordshire to adopt a county-wide approach. The committee also suggested that the procedure should specify what constituted a quorum at a complaints panel meeting.
The committee noted that the issue of confidentiality would be kept under review. The councillor who had been complained about, should be able to find out who had lodged the complaint but the monitoring officer would consider each case on its merits to determine whether confidentiality must be kept.
RESOLVED: To
(a) appoint sub-committees (to be known as complaints panels) comprising three members of the committee or their appointed substitutes and authorise the complaints panels to determine code of conduct complaints referred by the monitoring officer;
(b) appoint each member or substitute of the Audit and Governance Committee to serve on any complaints panel which is convened so as to include her or him in its membership;
(c) agree that wherever possible, a panel shall comprise the chairman or vice-chairman of the committee plus two other members of the committee, but that this should not affect the principle that any three members of the committee or their appointed substitutes will constitute a properly appointed panel;
(d) authorise the head of legal and democratic services to convene panels having regard to councillors’ availability and eligibility to take part;
(e) adopt the procedures for dealing with code of conduct complaints set out in appendix 1 to the monitoring officer’s report with effect from 12 July 2012 and in place of the council’s existing arrangements for dealing with code of conduct complaints, subject to agreeing the following amendments with Councillor Andrew Crawford: ... view the full minutes text for item 8. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury management strategy update PDF 41 KB To consider the head of finance’s report. Reporting officer: Bob Watson
Purpose: to inform the committee of two changes made to the Treasury Management Strategy approved by Council in February 2012. The strategy approved by Council on 22 February 2012 is appended.
Recommendation: To note the changes to the treasury management strategy. Additional documents:
Minutes: The committee considered the head of finance’s report on changes to the treasury management strategy. Under delegated authority, the chief finance officer had amended the strategy to vary the counterparty list. This was due to the current financial climate and recent downgrading of banks by the main ratings agencies. There was an increasing difficulty in finding suitable counterparties for the council’s funds - particularly the medium to longer-term investments. This had necessitated a review of the counterparty criteria. The first amendment was to increase the limit on government-backed institutions, namely Lloyds Group and RBS, from £5 million to £10 million. The second amendment was to re-insert the “Banks 3” paragraph in the ‘eligible institutions’ part of appendix A to the strategy.
When the treasury management strategy for 2012/13 was approved by Council in February 2012, the Eligible Institutions criteria (Banks 3) was omitted due to following an industry standard template upon which the council based its strategy. The recent review of the credit ratings, meant that the council’s counterparty list was reducing and to not re-insert “Banks 3” would not allow the council to use staple partners such as Santander UK and Close Brothers Bank. The following amendment was proposed and agreed by the Chief Financial Officer:
Appendix A paragraph 19: · insert new sub-paragraph after 'Banks 2' as follows: “Banks 3 – Eligible Institutions - the organisation is an Eligible Institution for the HM Treasury Credit Guarantee Scheme initially announced on 13 October 2008, with the necessary short and long term ratings required in Banks 1 above. These institutions have been subject to suitability checks before inclusion, and have access to HM Treasury liquidity if needed.” · rename current "Banks 3" to "Banks 4"
RESOLVED: To note the changes to the treasury management strategy. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statement of accounts 2011/12 PDF 493 KB To receive the draft statement of accounts for 2011/12 (see separate document). Reporting officer: William Jacobs
Purpose: To consider the process for the production of the statement of accounts. Additional documents: Minutes: The committee received the draft statement of accounts 2011/12. Councillors noted that under the financial reporting rules, the chief finance officer had the responsibility to approve the draft statement of accounts for submission to the external auditor by 30 June 2012. This he had done. The accounts were brought to the committee for councillors to consider the process for the production of the accounts. At its meeting in September, the committee would be required to approve the final accounts having obtained assurance that they had been prepared properly in accordance with the accounting regulations.
The committee welcomed the opportunity to consider the draft accounts and thanked the officers for providing training on the committee’s role. Councillors suggested the following amendments:
RESOLVED: To
(a) request the officers to organise a question and answer session on the statement of accounts in early September; and
(b) remind the relevant councillors that they need to complete and return their related party transactions form to the council. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Internal audit annual report 2011/12 PDF 57 KB To consider the audit manager’s report. Reporting officer: Adrianna Partridge
Purpose: to report on the work of internal audit in the year ended 31 March 2012, and to advise the committee of the audit manager’s opinion on the overall adequacy and effectiveness of the internal control environment. This looks at: · systemic control weaknesses · planned, unplanned and follow-up audits · self-assessment · feedback on the internal audit service
Recommendation: to note the report. Additional documents:
Minutes: The committee considered the audit manager’s annual report on the internal audit function in 2011/12. The report reviewed progress against the audit plan, and advised the committee of the audit manager’s opinion of the overall adequacy and effectiveness of the council’s internal control environment.
It was the audit manager’s unqualified opinion that satisfactory assurance could be placed on the council’s risk management, control, and governance processes in place throughout the year. Seven internal audit reviews had resulted in full assurance and there had been notable improvements in council tax, housing and council tax benefits, and travel and subsistence. Areas of weaknesses identified by internal audit had resulted in action plans setting out improvements in the establishment list, the HR Pro system, payroll, and waste management. However, where internal audit had identified opportunities to improve internal controls, officers had responded positively. Where internal audit had greatest concerns, these areas were identified as systemic control weaknesses and were given top priority.
The committee debated whether the audit manager should have direct reporting access to the strategic management board, as recommended by the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy. Councillors noted that if the council followed this guidance, the audit manager would be the only fourth tier manager to have such direct access to the board. The audit manager allayed the committee’s concerns, reporting that she had sufficient access under the existing arrangements to report direct to the chief executive or directly to the committee if required. The committee was content with this.
RESOLVED: To note the report. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Internal audit management report - quarter 1, 2012/13 PDF 56 KB To consider the audit manager’s report. Reporting officer: Adrianna Partridge
Purpose: To report on management issues within internal audit; to summarise the progress against the 2012/13 audit plan up to 20June 2012; and to summarise the priorities for quarter two 2012/13. Appendix 2 shows the audit plan schedule for 2012/13; this appears on page . Recommendation: to note the report. Additional documents:
Minutes: The committee considered the audit manager’s report on internal audit management in the first quarter of 2012/13, being 1 April to 30 June 2012. This looked at management issues within internal audit and progress against the 2012/13 audit plan. The committee noted that internal audit was on target against the audit plan and had visited the payroll service team at Capita’s office in Carlisle to undertake an audit. A report on this would be forthcoming.
RESOLVED: To note the report. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Internal audit activity report - quarter 1, 2012/13 PDF 101 KB To consider the audit manager’s report. Reporting officer: Adrianna Partridge
Purpose: To summarise the outcomes of recent internal audit activity for the committee to consider. The committee is asked to review the report and the main issues arising, and seek assurance that action will be/has been taken where necessary.
Recommendation: to note the report. Additional documents: Minutes: The committee considered the audit manager’s report on internal audit’s activity during the first quarter 2012/13, being 1 April to 30 June 2012. Of the audits referred to in the report, two had received full assurance, six had received satisfactory assurance, and two had received a limited assurance rating. The report also referred to five follow-up audits, of which in the initial audit review one had received full assurance, two had received satisfactory assurance, and two had received a limited assurance rating. The audit manager reported that due to the length of the agenda for this meeting, the chairman had agreed to only bring one limited assurance report to this meeting, whereas the other limited assurance report on the HR Pro (the human resources IT system) 2011/12, would be brought to the next committee meeting.
The committee considered the report on the pro-active anti-fraud audit. Capita had introduced a new control, following a recommendation by internal audit, that when payroll received requests with an electronic signature to change bank payments to a new bank account, Capita would contact the council’s human resources officer or the named officer to obtain confirmation of the request by email.
The committee noted that as part of the pro-active anti-fraud audit, a test had revealed that car park wardens had not correctly checked a parking permit. Councillors suggested that the text on parking permits could be made easier to read.
RESOLVED: To note the report. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments on internal audit reports not presented to committee PDF 66 KB To consider the audit manager’s report. Reporting officer: Adrianna Partridge
If committee members have any comments/questions on any of the internal audit reports not presented to the committee, they should submit these in advance of the meeting to the audit manager.
Purpose: To respond to questions raised on internal audit reports not presented to committee from quarter 1 2012/13. Recommendation: To note the report. Minutes: The committee considered the audit manager’s report that set out councillors’ comments on internal audit reports not presented to the committee in the activity report (minute AG.13 refers). The report also included responses from internal audit and the relevant service manager.
The committee noted that training was available to councillors on an introduction to treasury management. The chairman asked that the date was circulated to committee members.
With regard to the follow-up audit on grounds maintenance, the committee noted that some recommendations had not been implemented. Internal audit commented that a second follow-up audit would be undertaken in the year and would report to committee if there were any concerns.
RESOLVED: To
(a) note the report; and
(a) circulate the date for councillor training on an introduction to treasury management. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Draft annual governance statement 2011/12 PDF 129 KB To consider the draft annual governance statement 2011/12. Reporting officer: Steve Culliford
Recommendation: To comment on the draft annual governance statement. Minutes: The committee considered the draft annual governance statement 2011/12. The committee noted that this statement accompanied the statement of accounts and was open to the council’s external auditors to comment on. The committee was asked to consider the draft statement and suggest any improvements before the committee would be asked to adopt it at its meeting in September. The committee suggested one amendment.
RESOLVED: To amend the draft annual governance statement in paragraph 102 to add a reference to the audit manager’s ability to report directly to the chief executive or the committee if necessary. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audit Commission: verbal update on transition to Ernst & Young To consider a verbal update from the Audit Commission on the transition to Enrst & Young. Minutes: The committee received a verbal update from Anne Ockleston of the Audit Commission on the transition of the council’s external audit function to Ernst & Young. Ernst & Young had been appointed as the external auditor for local government across south-east England. It wanted to transfer staff from the Audit Commission to cause minimum disruption to the audit process for councils. The transfer was due to take place on 1 November 2012. Maria Grindley and Anne Ockleston were due to transfer to Ernst & Young from that date and were due to continue as the council’s external auditors, although this had yet to be confirmed. The committee would receive a further update in September. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuation of meeting Minutes: The committee was asked whether it wished to finish the meeting at this point or continue for a further 30 minutes to the three-hour limit to comply with standing order 27.
RESOLVED: To continue the meeting to complete the remaining business by 9.30pm. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To note the chairman’s attached response to the Audit Commission on understanding how the committee gains assurance from management. Additional documents: Minutes: The committee noted the contents of a letter from its chairman to the Audit Commission. This set out how the council’s Audit and Governance Committee gained assurance from management on internal control mechanisms, tackling fraud, complying with the law, and ensuring that the council could continue as a going concern.
RESOLVED: To note the contents of the chairman’s letter to the Audit Commission. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To adopt and sign as a correct record the minutes of the meeting of the committee held on 21 March 2012. Minutes: RESOLVED: To adopt as a correct record the minutes of the committee meeting held on 21 March 2012 and agree that the chairman signs them as a correct record. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To consider the strategic director’s report. Reporting officer: Steve Bishop
Purpose: To review the actions arising from the last two committee meetings and receive an update on progress. Minutes: The committee considered the strategic director’s report on actions arising from previous committee meetings and updated the schedule as set out below.
RESOLVED: To update the actions arising as follows:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Audit and governance work programme PDF 48 KB To review the audit and governance work programme and note the training programme. Reporting officer: Steve Culliford Additional documents:
Minutes: The committee reviewed its work programme and training programme for the remainder of 2012/13.
RESOLVED: To amend the work programme and training programme as follows:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exempt information under section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 None |
01235 422520
(Text phone users add 18001 before dialing)
Vale of White Horse District Council
Abbey House, Abbey Close,
Abingdon
OX14 3JE